This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2019, 10, 2563–2567, doi:10.3762/bjnano.10.247
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 9, 187–204, doi:10.3762/bjnano.9.21
Figure 1: Hybrid materials: a) wet TPS, b) wet TPS_Au2.5 c) dry TPS, d) wet TS e) wet TS_Au2.5 f) dry TS.
Figure 2: From top to bottom: SEM Images (left) of the surfaces of TPS, TPS_Au2.5, TS, and TS_Au2.5 at differ...
Figure 3: TEM images of TPS, TPS_Au2.5, TS, and TS_Au5.0 at different magnifications. Red circles highlight t...
Figure 4: XRD patterns of the hybrid materials. Reflections labeled • are anatase reflections (ICDD: 98-015-4...
Figure 5: Au 4f, Ti 2p, C 1s, N 1s, and O 1s XP spectra of the TS_Au2.5 (left) and TPS_Au2.5 (right) surfaces...
Figure 6: Raman spectra of (A) TPS_Aux and (B) TS_Aux. (C) IR spectra of TiO2 made using the same procedure e...
Figure 7: Nitrogen sorption isotherms of TPS (black symbols), TPS_Au2.5 (blue symbols), TS_Au2.5 (green symbo...
Figure 8: Cumulative (blue) and relative (red) pore volume of TPS (top) and TS (bottom) measured by Hg intrus...
Figure 9: H2 production of the hybrid materials using a sunlight simulator. A) Numbers are mmol of H2 produce...
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 861–862, doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.87